Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

F3-17000CL11-4GBXL stuck at 1600MHz

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • F3-17000CL11-4GBXL stuck at 1600MHz

    Hi,
    The memory in my system (I believe) is rated to run at up to 2133MHz, though currently I can only get it to run at 1600MHz.

    If I try to get the memory running at 2133MHz by selecting the XMP Profile1 the system does not post (it actually did one time and appeared, but on reboot I was unable to post again). I've also tried the XMP Profile1 with bumping the DRAM voltage from 1.5 to 1.6v, which let me successfully post but once again I got an unable to post message on reboot (is there another voltage I should try boosting).

    Is it possible to reliably run at 2133MHz with this combination (or even 1866MHz), or am I stuck at 1600MHz. I've read something about bumping up the Memory and/or CPU voltage but I'm pretty in the dark about what the risks are there and what values I should be attempting in able to ensure the system runs happily.

    The relevant parts in the system are:

    * i5-2400
    * Gigabyte Z68X-UD3R-B3 (F6 Bios)
    * G.Skill F3-17000CL11D-4GBXL (2x4GB)

    Any suggestions/advice would be very appreciated, thanks in advance!
    Last edited by james73; 12-15-2015, 04:31 PM.

  • #2
    No ideas?

    I've tried a few things, including adjusting voltages (of the DRAM from 1.5 to 1.6v) as well as ensuring the timing values match as they should (Profile1 appears correct) but no dice.

    Comment


    • #3
      You may want to try 1866 first, that CPU may not support 2133.

      Boosting the VCCIO Voltage can help the memory controller.

      DDR3-1866 9-11-10-28 1.60V

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi,

        Thanks for the suggestions, they we're certainly helpful.

        The VCCIO/VTT voltage was the key here, booting it from 1.05V to 1.1V (with the DRAM voltage at 1.6V).

        I'm happily running at 1866MHz with the timings you gave me (though 9-9-9-28 seem stable as well).

        Thanks a lot for the help!

        Comment


        • #5
          You can test to see which is faster. Some times the lower latency is not necessarily faster even though theoretically lower is quicker.

          Comment

          Working...
          X