Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GSkill F2-8500CL5D-2GBPK bandwidth lower than expected

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GSkill F2-8500CL5D-2GBPK bandwidth lower than expected

    Benchmarking with MaxxMem2 shows memory score 7.3 GB/s.
    Memory score seems approximately 14% below the expected 8.5 GB/s
    for a single channel. But this is a dual channel setup, so
    was expecting a memory score of 9 GB/s or more.

    (I was expecting more because I have an older PC with dual channel
    PC3200 and it gets a memory score of 4.36 GB/s - that's 36% greater
    than the expected rate for single channel PC3200)

    Can you please explain why the GSkill F2-8500CL5D-2GBPK memory score
    is low?

    System board: GIGA-BYTE GA-EP45-UD3L
    Latest BIOS F9
    BIOS set with factory defaults
    Processor : Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
    Memory : 4GB = 2 F2-8500CL5D-2GBPK (4 1GB sticks - dual channel)

    CPUZ shows : FSB 333.7 MHz
    Memory Frequency 533.9 MHz

    Thank you.

  • #2
    Post up some BIOS pictures. Some tweaking may be needed. A slight overclock to CPU will quickly take care of that.

    Thank you
    GSKILL TECH

    Comment


    • #3
      GIGA-BYTE GA-EP45-UD3L BIOS pictures

      Please let me know if you need more or better pictures.

      Thank you.







      Comment


      • #4
        Nothing is set, you'll want to do that first.

        DRAM Frequency, timings, and voltage.

        Thank you
        GSKILL TECH

        Comment


        • #5
          Memory works great at 800, but not at 1066 (for me)

          Other details I didn't previously mention:

          the GIGA-BYTE GA-EP45-UD3L system board is version 1.0, and
          the operating system is Windows 7 Home Premium (x64) Service Pack 1 (build 7601).


          ONE: Made the following BIOS changes:

          Performance Enhance - Standard
          DRAM Timing Selectabe - Manual
          Systen Memory Multiplier - 3.20B
          tCL - 5, tRCD - 5, tRP - 5, tRAS - 15, tRFC - 80, Command Rate - 2
          DRAM Voltage - 2.1, MCH Core - 1.4

          Trying to boot, got BSOD (Blue Screen OF Death) after windows
          screen with bar but before background screen with icons
          (That is, could not complete Window 7 initialization).

          TWO: Made the following BIOS changes:

          tCL - 6, tRCD - 6, tRP - 6, tRAS - 18

          Windows 7 completed initialization.
          Benchmark results with MaxxMem2: Bandwidth 6.82 GB/sec and Latency 87ns.
          Ran Memtest86+ (v4.20) and got over 1000 errors within a few minutes.

          THREE: Make the following BIOS changes:

          Systen Memory Multiplier - 2.40B
          tCL - 5, tRCD - 5, tRP - 5, tRAS - 15, tRFC - 68, Command Rate - 2
          DRAM Voltage - 1.8, MCH Core - 1.1

          Windows 7 completed initialization.
          Benchmark results with MaxxMem2: Bandwidth 6.76 GB/sec and Latency 78.2ns.
          Ran Memtest86+ (v4.20) for a while without errors.

          COMCLUSION (so far):

          2 pairs (4 sticks) of F2-8500CL5D-2GBPK memory in GA-EP45-UD3L board (v 1.0)
          work very well where the memory is set like F2-6400CL5D-2GBPK. It's totally
          stable. The dual channel bandwidth (6.76 GB/sec) exceeds spec 6.4 GB/sec of
          a single stick. Also, able to use other BIOS performance improvements such as setting
          CPU Intelligent Accelerator 2 to "Turbo" (increases CPU frequency by 15% to 17%) and
          still totally stable.

          On the other hand, trying to run the 2 pair of F2-8500CL5D-2GBPK memory at 1066 in the
          GA-EP45-UD3L board (v 1.0) has never been stable for me. Over the past 2 years,
          with the F7 BIOS, there was an annoying boot loop every few months. After upgrading
          to the F9 BIOS, there was a BSOR one to three times a day. After these problems,
          benchmarking the memory, it was found to be 14% below the expected bandwidth for a
          single stick. I would ask Gigabyte about this, but no GSkill memory is in their
          "Qualified Vendors List" for the board.

          If you have any suggestions for running at 1066 where it is stable and the bandwidth
          is over 8.5 GB/sec, I'll give it a try. Otherwise. I'm just going to run it at 800.

          Thank you.
          Last edited by rnthorburn; 07-30-2011, 01:43 PM. Reason: Last paragraph was missing in my reply

          Comment

          Working...
          X