Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PHOENIX FM-25S2S-120GBP1 ruinning slow!!!help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    sam350,
    if you have another HD that has OS:windows 7 and you install your SSD as an slave disk that with no data, just create partition on your SSD and format it under windows 7, the OS will automatically align your SSD. You don't have to align manually.
    you can check whether your SSD is aligned or not by this tool : AS SSD
    if it is aligned, you will see "XXXK-OK" on the benchmark.

    Comment


    • #17
      This is my results


      My best regards

      Comment


      • #18
        ok jsut a updat have formatted drive am trying to align partitions...
        i can do spep 1,2 i can list the disks but how do i choose the correct disk i have option 1 and two.....tried writing in disk 1 wont let me select it do ihave to phrase which disk i want to select in a certian way or command??

        From a command prompt window:
        1. Run Diskpart
        2. keyin "List Disk", press "Enter"
        3. Select the appropriate Disk
        4. keyin "Create partition primary align = 64", press "Enter"
        5. Close command prompt

        Comment


        • #19
          ok i have re-formatted and updated all drivers....
          tested benchmark using as ssd benchmark 1.5 and hdd is portitions are aligned according to as ssd...this is my scores.....

          AS SSD Benchmark 1.5.3784.37609
          ------------------------------
          Name: FM-25S2S-100GBP1
          Firmware: 305A
          Controller: iaStor
          Offset: 103424 K - OK
          Size: 93.16 GB
          Date: 7/15/2010 12:07:41 AM
          ------------------------------
          Sequential:
          ------------------------------
          Read: 209.80 MB/s
          Write: 85.93 MB/s
          ------------------------------
          4K:
          ------------------------------
          Read: 22.03 MB/s
          Write: 75.91 MB/s
          ------------------------------
          4K-64Threads:
          ------------------------------
          Read: 119.44 MB/s
          Write: 79.07 MB/s
          ------------------------------
          Access Times:
          ------------------------------
          Read: 0.177 ms
          Write: 0.219 ms
          ------------------------------
          Score:
          ------------------------------
          Read: 162
          Write: 164
          Total: 412
          ------------------------------


          arn't the write speeds meant to be around 14omb\s in all reviews and bencahmarks iv seen why arn't mine still up around those levels.....80mb\s is much lower.....only ever got 140mb\s when first installed the g.skill ssd 10min later went down to lower scores.!!!! what can i try now ALSO USERNAME RANXEROX HAS POSTED HIS BENCAHMARKS PRETTY MUCH THE SAME AS MINE....HIS WRITE SCORES ARE VERY LOW 2!!

          Comment


          • #20
            This is my results with crystall disk mark

            Comment


            • #21
              your crystal disk mark scores are hugley higer than mine !!! plz help again g.skill thanx in advance

              Comment


              • #22
                Download the last version of CrystalDiskMark3.0.0e 64 bits and select all 0 fill.
                Read the faq. Run the test three times

                My Hardware

                Corsair Obsidian 800D
                Intel QX9650 3.00 Ghz.
                Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 BIOS F6
                8 Gb. Mushkin Extreme EM3-10666 DDR3 1333
                2xSapphire ATi AMD HD5870 Vapor-X 1GB OC
                Hauppauge WinTV HVR-4000
                IB-AC604 USB3.0 PCI Express 5Gb/s (IB-AC604)
                WD2001FASS
                2*WD Velociraptor 300GB WD3000HLFS MASTER SATA 3Gb/s 16MB-cache RAID1
                G.Skill FM-25S2S-100GBP1 MLC Sandforce MASTER 100G SATA 3Gb/s PHOENIX 2.5??
                Corsair HX 1000 W.
                LG DVDRAM GH20NS10
                LG BD GGW-H20L
                Hp laserjet CM1312 MFP nfi
                3 * BenQ G2222HDL
                Keyboard and mouse Logitech dinovo Media Desktop Laser


                My best regards.
                Last edited by Ranxerox; 07-14-2010, 10:29 PM.

                Comment


                • #23
                  hi sam350,
                  our website benchmark snapshot is testing SSD in its "clean" status.

                  if you run benchmark too many times, i think blocks of your SSD will fill with more and more garbage datas. thus the score you get would get lower.

                  so i suggest you to clean it again and then test it again. You can clean it by a free dos program "HDDerase".
                  copy it to a bootable usb pendrive and execute it.

                  i would post a guide to show the procedures later.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Thank You very much for the Link vaca

                    My best regards

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Dear sam350,
                      I've post an guide to show how to secure erase SSD thus it may recover your performance.
                      You could try it and tell me if it works?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Ranxerox View Post
                        This is my results with crystall disk mark

                        What are your results with the Default (Random) Test Data set?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          This is my results in default mode


                          And this my results with ATTO and garbage in the hard disk


                          My best regards
                          Last edited by Ranxerox; 07-16-2010, 11:08 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            i havent used HDD erase yet thought id post what iv found.... found that using crystal disk mark 3.0 results depends hugley with what options you use... under file-test data- you have three options defult data, fill 1, fill 0.....if u use fill 0 or 1 i get the following results which are really really good (which setting should be used??)

                            Sequential Read : 278.738 MB/s
                            sequential Write : 271.960 MB/s
                            Random Read 512KB : 272.267 MB/s
                            Random Write 512KB : 269.893 MB/s
                            Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 38.807 MB/s [ 9474.4 IOPS]
                            Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 87.781 MB/s [ 21430.9 IOPS]
                            Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 199.849 MB/s [ 48791.3 IOPS]
                            Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 61.122 MB/s [ 14922.3 IOPS]

                            but if i use defult setting i get much lower performance

                            Sequential Read : 224.055 MB/s
                            Sequential Write : 73.071 MB/s
                            Random Read 512KB : 213.570 MB/s
                            Random Write 512KB : 73.530 MB/s
                            Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 30.715 MB/s [ 7498.8 IOPS]
                            Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 68.916 MB/s [ 16825.3 IOPS]
                            Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 155.751 MB/s [ 38025.1 IOPS]
                            Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 75.507 MB/s [ 18434.4 IOPS]

                            using atto benchmark my results are pretty much on par with your from website which is good....

                            using as ssd benchmark my results are low.. write speeds suffering..

                            AS SSD Benchmark 1.5.3784.37609
                            ------------------------------
                            Name: FM-25S2S-100GBP1
                            Firmware: 2.1
                            Controller: iaStor
                            Offset: 103424 K - OK
                            ------------------------------
                            Sequential:
                            ------------------------------
                            Read: 209.46 MB/s
                            Write: 75.57 MB/s
                            ------------------------------
                            4K:
                            ------------------------------
                            Read: 21.04 MB/s
                            Write: 72.63 MB/s
                            ------------------------------
                            4K-64Threads:
                            ------------------------------
                            Read: 119.18 MB/s
                            Write: 75.77 MB/s
                            ------------------------------
                            Access Times:
                            ------------------------------
                            Read: 0.194 ms
                            Write: 0.213 ms
                            ------------------------------
                            Score:
                            ------------------------------
                            Read: 161
                            Write: 156
                            Total: 402
                            ------------------------------

                            is this just a problem with the benchmark programs giving inconsistant results or should i still use hdd erase.... and c how we go?? thanxu in advance for your help

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I use HDErase and the first test with ATTO Benchmark was spectacular.

                              I haven?t the results with HDErase but transfer increases the first time you pass the Test.

                              My best regards

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by sam350 View Post
                                i get the following results which are really really good (which setting should be used??)
                                ........
                                For CrystalDiskMark, you should use the Default (Random)

                                is this just a problem with the benchmark programs giving inconsistant results or should i still use hdd erase.... and c how we go?? thanxu in advance for your help
                                Each benchmark program tests things differently. It's almost impossible to compare from one benchmark to another. You should usually only do comparisons for benchmark runs using exactly the same program and the same settings in that program.

                                Everyone has an opinion, but my opinion is that random data is closer to the real world than filling all zeros. I also think that random reads and writes are closer to the real world than sequential. But again, it is only my opinion.

                                Good luck

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X