poor performance after launch wiper

[salocinad]

i have launch wiper.exe because my performance is so poor after have install win7 64bits in C:/
WHY wiper.exe not resume the original performance after launch ?
FALCON II 128gb
--------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 2.2 (C) 2007-2008 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
--------------------------------------------------

Sequential Read : 235.031 MB/s
Sequential Write : 91.207 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 184.848 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 89.579 MB/s
Random Read 4KB : 30.355 MB/s
Random Write 4KB : 8.300 MB/s

Test Size : 100 MB
Date : 2009/12/04 18:12:21

[DarthCaedus]

So you're using the new falcon II drives? They come with trim, so you shouldn't have to run wiper at all.

[TwoCables]

i have launch wiper.exe because my performance is so poor after have install win7 64bits in C:/
WHY wiper.exe not resume the original performance after launch ?
FALCON II 128gb
--------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 2.2 (C) 2007-2008 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
--------------------------------------------------

Sequential Read : 235.031 MB/s
Sequential Write : 91.207 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 184.848 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 89.579 MB/s
Random Read 4KB : 30.355 MB/s
Random Write 4KB : 8.300 MB/s

Test Size : 100 MB
Date : 2009/12/04 18:12:21

The Falcon II's are supposed to have better TRIM support than the first Falcons (with firmware 1571), so Wiper is not necessary on these drives.

So, if this is true, then just let your system idle for a few hours and then see if the performance improves at all.

[salocinad]

Ok !!!
I tested today and the performance is back to normal.
I have not used wiper.exe after reinstalling the system.
After leaving the PC on standby for a moment.
FALCON II 128Gb

--------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 2.2 (C) 2007-2008 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
--------------------------------------------------

Sequential Read : 243.531 MB/s
Sequential Write : 114.832 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 183.226 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 136.246 MB/s
Random Read 4KB : 30.849 MB/s
Random Write 4KB : 8.906 MB/s

Test Size : 100 MB
Date : 2009/12/14 19:01:16

NO NEED WIPER.EXE IN WIN 7 AND FALCON II !!!

[TwoCables]

Ok !!!
I tested today and the performance is back to normal.
I have not used wiper.exe after reinstalling the system.
After leaving the PC on standby for a moment.
FALCON II 128Gb

--------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 2.2 (C) 2007-2008 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
--------------------------------------------------

Sequential Read : 243.531 MB/s
Sequential Write : 114.832 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 183.226 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 136.246 MB/s
Random Read 4KB : 30.849 MB/s
Random Write 4KB : 8.906 MB/s

Test Size : 100 MB
Date : 2009/12/14 19:01:16

NO NEED WIPER.EXE IN WIN 7 AND FALCON II !!!

Very nice. I think I know what my next SSD will be now!

[CorporateGoth]

Is there need to run wiper on W7 x64 with an original falcon with 1819 firmware?

I ask because I ran crystal disk mark, and I get:

Seq Read/Write: 217.0mb / 121.9mb
512k Read/Write: 145.6mb / 66.32mb
4k Read/Write: 27.37mb / 7.917mb

The Falcons are supposed to actually be faster than the Falcon II's, and regardless of that, I think the falcons are supposed to be higher than above, especially in 512k write.

I tried running wiper (both the wiper from these forums, and from OCZ's), and the one from here caused my hdd to go kaput, the one from OCZ forums would not detect my drive as wipable.

PreZ