Hi,
That RAM is listed on your site as "9-9-9-24-2N," but I can find nothing beyond that.
For a few years, I've had one set (8GB total) running fine as seen in the "Active" column here. Until recently, I hadn't noticed that it was just on the default and that XMP wasn't in effect, so I was running at 11-11-11-28-1T (the 1T confirmed with CPU-Z).
Having tried XMP today ("Proposed" column), 9-9-9-24-1T seems fine (1T again confirmed by CPU-Z), and as you'll see, tRASmin, tRFC, tRC, and especially tFAW are also different.
I now have another set of the above RAM ready to install (bringing me to 16GB), but I understand from other posts that XMP will no longer be available or appropriate. The default way that I had always used with one set may work (11-11-11-28-1T), but I don't think that's ideal (not looking to OC but just get as close as possible to what the RAM is spec'd to do).
How do the XMP numbers shown in the Proposed column mesh with the full specs of the RAM beyond just 9-9-9-24-2N? tFAW, for one, seems weirdly high at 50, though maybe there's a good reason for it.
Side-question: Should the age difference of the two sets really matter?
Thanks
That RAM is listed on your site as "9-9-9-24-2N," but I can find nothing beyond that.
For a few years, I've had one set (8GB total) running fine as seen in the "Active" column here. Until recently, I hadn't noticed that it was just on the default and that XMP wasn't in effect, so I was running at 11-11-11-28-1T (the 1T confirmed with CPU-Z).
Having tried XMP today ("Proposed" column), 9-9-9-24-1T seems fine (1T again confirmed by CPU-Z), and as you'll see, tRASmin, tRFC, tRC, and especially tFAW are also different.
I now have another set of the above RAM ready to install (bringing me to 16GB), but I understand from other posts that XMP will no longer be available or appropriate. The default way that I had always used with one set may work (11-11-11-28-1T), but I don't think that's ideal (not looking to OC but just get as close as possible to what the RAM is spec'd to do).
How do the XMP numbers shown in the Proposed column mesh with the full specs of the RAM beyond just 9-9-9-24-2N? tFAW, for one, seems weirdly high at 50, though maybe there's a good reason for it.
Side-question: Should the age difference of the two sets really matter?
Thanks
Comment